|
.net
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Advice requiredHi there,
I'm a very experienced developer but relative new to ASP.NET (not exactly a novice but still feeling my way around). I'm about to start development of a new (commercial) web site and would like to know what technology I should be pursuing. The site will provide a front-end for users who will log on, input data, generate reports, etc. (lots of web forms and controls involved with all this). Everything is captured at the back-end in a SQL Server DB. Can anyone enlighten me on what technology I should be investigating. Should I be looking at WPF for instance or stick with the tried and true ways I've been reading about (using standard web controls bound to my business objects using "ObjectDataSource" controls and ultimately invoking strongly-typed datasets to update the DB). I'm fairly green in the latter area (though find it very easy so far) and have no WPF experience whatsoever so I'm not sure where these technologies diverge, whether they're completely different, etc. I just need some guidance on what technology and design patterns I should be pursuing. Presumably it boils down to WPF versus the older ways of doing things but maybe someone can set me straight. Thanks in advance. If the application is accessed through a browser there are several
architectural choices: Web forms, i.e typical ASP.NET, MVC which is not as mature as Web forms and finally Silverlight. WPF like Silverlight is based on XAML but is used as the next generation of Windows forms for applications that run on the desktop. Since you said "web site" your choices are Web forms, MVC (Model View Controller) or Silverlight noting Silverlight gives us the look and feel of Flash with some improvements here and there but a steep learning curve. Web forms is the easiest and has the most blog and other documentation you can find. That said, MVC is probably the future. There's also a couple of data architectures to access data in SQL Server. Boy are you in for a learning curve. You may have experience as a developer but you are not ready for the scope of the project as you imply without some ..NET experience on some other project(s) to get familiar with the many choices available. Its like being Sybil and we have to manage 16 different personalities which is why .NET developers are usually pyscho. Show quoteHide quote "jk" <_nospam@_no_spam.com> wrote in message news:uU3$j2a$JHA.200@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Hi there, > > I'm a very experienced developer but relative new to ASP.NET (not exactly > a novice but still feeling my way around). I'm about to start development > of a new (commercial) web site and would like to know what technology I > should be pursuing. The site will provide a front-end for users who will > log on, input data, generate reports, etc. (lots of web forms and controls > involved with all this). Everything is captured at the back-end in a SQL > Server DB. Can anyone enlighten me on what technology I should be > investigating. Should I be looking at WPF for instance or stick with the > tried and true ways I've been reading about (using standard web controls > bound to my business objects using "ObjectDataSource" controls and > ultimately invoking strongly-typed datasets to update the DB). I'm fairly > green in the latter area (though find it very easy so far) and have no WPF > experience whatsoever so I'm not sure where these technologies diverge, > whether they're completely different, etc. I just need some guidance on > what technology and design patterns I should be pursuing. Presumably it > boils down to WPF versus the older ways of doing things but maybe someone > can set me straight. Thanks in advance. > > If the application is accessed through a browser there are several Ok, thanks. I'll look into all of this but I'm still not sure where WPF fits> architectural choices: Web forms, i.e typical ASP.NET, MVC which is not as > mature as Web forms and finally Silverlight. WPF like Silverlight is based > on XAML but is used as the next generation of Windows forms for > applications that run on the desktop. > > Since you said "web site" your choices are Web forms, MVC (Model View > Controller) or Silverlight noting Silverlight gives us the look and feel > of Flash with some improvements here and there but a steep learning curve. > Web forms is the easiest and has the most blog and other documentation you > can find. That said, MVC is probably the future. in (for web-based programming and its relation to ASP.NET and the existing web controls in particular). Can or should it be used in this environment and what about the richness of its native controls. Can I also use the existing web controls with it? > There's also a couple of data architectures to access data in SQL Server. Well, I'm realistic but not intimidated. For all the design patterns,> Boy are you in for a learning curve. You may have experience as a > developer but you are not ready for the scope of the project as you imply > without some .NET experience on some other project(s) to get familiar with > the many choices available. Its like being Sybil and we have to manage 16 > different personalities which is why .NET developers are usually pyscho. technologies, acronymns, etc. that .NET has to offer, I cut my teeth in the WinAPI which is a much tougher environment (using C and later C++). After almost 25 years on MSFT platforms (starting wtih DOS), including 3 years of .NET and some (limited) ASP.NET experience, it doesn't take me long to learn things. I got through some of these tutorials in no time (http://www.asp.net/learn/data-access/) but it's unclear whether I should be looking at WPF or now (based on your feedback) MVC. Silverlight doesn't seem appropriate at this point but I'll have to investigate further. Thanks again.
Show quote
Hide quote
"jk" <_nospam@_no_spam.com> wrote in message 1) Model View Presenter patternnews:uU3$j2a$JHA.200@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Hi there, > > I'm a very experienced developer but relative new to ASP.NET (not exactly > a novice but still feeling my way around). I'm about to start development > of a new (commercial) web site and would like to know what technology I > should be pursuing. The site will provide a front-end for users who will > log on, input data, generate reports, etc. (lots of web forms and controls > involved with all this). Everything is captured at the back-end in a SQL > Server DB. Can anyone enlighten me on what technology I should be > investigating. Should I be looking at WPF for instance or stick with the > tried and true ways I've been reading about (using standard web controls > bound to my business objects using "ObjectDataSource" controls and > ultimately invoking strongly-typed datasets to update the DB). I'm fairly > green in the latter area (though find it very easy so far) and have no WPF > experience whatsoever so I'm not sure where these technologies diverge, > whether they're completely different, etc. I just need some guidance on > what technology and design patterns I should be pursuing. Presumably it > boils down to WPF versus the older ways of doing things but maybe someone > can set me straight. Thanks in advance. 2) Windows Communications Web service with BLL and DAL setting behind the WCF Web service, with business objects sent to the UI as DTO(s) -- Data Transfer Objects, and those DTO(s) sent back to the WCF, with them becoming business objects again persisting themselves to the database via the DAL. 3) ORM solution such as ADO.NET Entity Framework with Linq-2-Entities, nHibernate or Link-2-SQL 4) Ajax with possible Telerik controls and standard controls 6) Light or no validation of user input at the UI, letting Windows Workflow validate business objects by object injection into a validation Workflow. Workflow is setting behind the WCF Web service on an application server that's hosting BLL, DAL and WF. 7) Disable viewstate on all UI controls. 8) Domain Driven Design pattern against the Model 9) Test Driven Design pattern against the Model using functional tests to test the entire backend before one even gets to the UI, with tools such as Reshapper, Gallio and MBunit. The same tools can be used for Unit Test mock-ups as well. 10) The ability to understand and use Linq. __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4219 (20090705) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
Show quote
Hide quote
> 1) Model View Presenter pattern Thanks for the info. I'll do some research on these items but what would you > > 2) Windows Communications Web service with BLL and DAL setting behind the > WCF Web service, with business objects sent to the UI as DTO(s) -- Data > Transfer Objects, and those DTO(s) sent back to the WCF, with them > becoming business objects again persisting themselves to the database via > the DAL. > > 3) ORM solution such as ADO.NET Entity Framework with Linq-2-Entities, > nHibernate or Link-2-SQL > > 4) Ajax with possible Telerik controls and standard controls > > 6) Light or no validation of user input at the UI, letting Windows > Workflow validate business objects by object injection into a validation > Workflow. Workflow is setting behind the WCF Web service on an application > server that's hosting BLL, DAL and WF. > > 7) Disable viewstate on all UI controls. > > 8) Domain Driven Design pattern against the Model > > 9) Test Driven Design pattern against the Model using functional tests to > test the entire backend before one even gets to the UI, with tools such as > Reshapper, Gallio and MBunit. The same tools can be used for Unit Test > mock-ups as well. > > 10) The ability to understand and use Linq. personally be looking at (ignoring any learning curve). What's best for the future IOW (in your opinion) but also consider that we need to get our site done without countless problems due to lack of documentation and/or because the technology is still too immature to proceed with. Thanks again.
Show quote
Hide quote
"jk" <_nospam@_no_spam.com> wrote in message Well, I can say that datasets are not the way to go if you're developing a news:ubDSKEj$JHA.3708@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> 1) Model View Presenter pattern >> >> 2) Windows Communications Web service with BLL and DAL setting behind the >> WCF Web service, with business objects sent to the UI as DTO(s) -- Data >> Transfer Objects, and those DTO(s) sent back to the WCF, with them >> becoming business objects again persisting themselves to the database via >> the DAL. >> >> 3) ORM solution such as ADO.NET Entity Framework with Linq-2-Entities, >> nHibernate or Link-2-SQL >> >> 4) Ajax with possible Telerik controls and standard controls >> >> 6) Light or no validation of user input at the UI, letting Windows >> Workflow validate business objects by object injection into a validation >> Workflow. Workflow is setting behind the WCF Web service on an >> application server that's hosting BLL, DAL and WF. >> >> 7) Disable viewstate on all UI controls. >> >> 8) Domain Driven Design pattern against the Model >> >> 9) Test Driven Design pattern against the Model using functional tests to >> test the entire backend before one even gets to the UI, with tools such >> as Reshapper, Gallio and MBunit. The same tools can be used for Unit Test >> mock-ups as well. >> >> 10) The ability to understand and use Linq. > > Thanks for the info. I'll do some research on these items but what would > you personally be looking at (ignoring any learning curve). What's best > for the future IOW (in your opinion) but also consider that we need to get > our site done without countless problems due to lack of documentation > and/or because the technology is still too immature to proceed with. > Thanks again. SOA solution. One goes with ADO.NET SQL command object using sprocs and building business objects that know how to persist themselves to the database based on object state or one uses an ORM solution with business objects that know how to persist themselves to a database based on object state. My own preference on this is to use an ORM solution like ADO.NET Entity Framework, which forces one to use OOP(s). People say that ADO.NET Entity Framework has promise and wait for the next release of VS. I disagree with them on this, as I am working projects where datasets are being used, and they are being converted over to ADO.Net Entity Framework. There is not a sproc to be found in use in the conversion, which is wonderful, and is different from the several hundred sprocs flying around the solutions use. MS's communication platform for communications between programs using SOA is WCF, which MS is pushing and is leveraging out of Net other legacy type communications, like legacy ASP.NET Web service and other legacy type communications. MVP allows the decoupling of the UI from the BLL/Model, something you should really look into, which basically makes the UI a dumb UI, if no business logic is in the UI itself. Also, using List<T> of objects and other Generics instead of using strong typed datasets, as datasets are too heavy in a SOA solution to be using, which opens the door to use Linq. I cannot place enough emphases on DDD and TDD, because if the design of the backend and testing of the backend is solid using the proper tests with the proper tools, there is very little that needs to be done at the UI is in contact with the UI and the MVP is in contact with the BLL, the way to go in a enterprise ASP.NET Web solution. __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4219 (20090705) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
Other interesting topics
Brwoser and screen width?
xhtmlConformance mode="Strict" Gridview binding twice Need Sr DOT NET Developer | Seatle,Washington | 2+ years Entity Framework - Reassigning child entity's parent Accessing GridViewRow.DataItem outside of GridView databinding events Problems adding HyperLink controls through code. Dynamic generation of a table Deleting table row in table grid using ASP.NET MVC double click reaches to inline code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||