|
.net
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Switching from http to https and backI'm presently upgrading a v1.1 ASP.NET app to v2. Parts of site run under SSL and parts don't, and the site uses this code: http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/WebPageSecurity.asp to switch between them - works perfectly. Setting up which files and/or folders need to run under https is a simple matter of adding some web.config settings. The code appears to run perfectly well under v2, but gives lots of warnings when the site is compiled. The relevant settings in web.config are as follows: <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration> <configSections> <section name="secureWebPages" type="Hyper.Web.Security.SecureWebPageSectionHandler, WebPageSecurity" allowLocation="false"/> </configSections> <secureWebPages> <directory path="security"/> </secureWebPages> <system.web> <httpModules> <add name="SecureWebPage" type="Hyper.Web.Security.SecureWebPageModule, WebPageSecurity"/> </httpModules> </system.web> </configuration> The warnings messages are: Could not find schema information for the element 'secureWebPages'. Could not find schema information for the element 'directory'. Could not find schema information for the attribute 'path'. As I said, the assembly appears to work perfectly under v2 of the Framework, so: 1) Do I need to be concerned about the warning messages? 2) Is there a way to specify the settings in web.config which the assembly needs which will not generate the warning messages? 3) There doesn't appear to be a v2 version of the assembly available, but is there a "native" v2 way of achieving the same functionality? Any assistance gratefully received. Mark Mark,
I'm afraid that I don't know how to eliminate the warnings, but (and anyone please correct me if I'm wrong) I don't think you need to worry about them. -- Show quoteHide quoteSincerely, S. Justin Gengo, MCP Web Developer / Programmer www.aboutfortunate.com "Out of chaos comes order." Nietzsche "Mark Rae" <m***@markN-O-S-P-A-M.co.uk> wrote in message news:%23F0DRAkEGHA.3004@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > Hi, > > I'm presently upgrading a v1.1 ASP.NET app to v2. Parts of site run under > SSL and parts don't, and the site uses this code: > > http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/WebPageSecurity.asp > > to switch between them - works perfectly. > > Setting up which files and/or folders need to run under https is a simple > matter of adding some web.config settings. The code appears to run > perfectly well under v2, but gives lots of warnings when the site is > compiled. The relevant settings in web.config are as follows: > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <configuration> > <configSections> > <section name="secureWebPages" > type="Hyper.Web.Security.SecureWebPageSectionHandler, WebPageSecurity" > allowLocation="false"/> > </configSections> > <secureWebPages> > <directory path="security"/> > </secureWebPages> > <system.web> > <httpModules> > <add name="SecureWebPage" > type="Hyper.Web.Security.SecureWebPageModule, WebPageSecurity"/> > </httpModules> > </system.web> > </configuration> > > The warnings messages are: > > Could not find schema information for the element 'secureWebPages'. > Could not find schema information for the element 'directory'. > Could not find schema information for the attribute 'path'. > > As I said, the assembly appears to work perfectly under v2 of the > Framework, so: > > 1) Do I need to be concerned about the warning messages? > > 2) Is there a way to specify the settings in web.config which the assembly > needs which will not generate the warning messages? > > 3) There doesn't appear to be a v2 version of the assembly available, but > is there a "native" v2 way of achieving the same functionality? > > Any assistance gratefully received. > > Mark > "S. Justin Gengo" <justin@[no_spam_please]aboutfortunate.com> wrote in Thanks for that - like I said, my initial testing shows that it works message news:elVM%233tEGHA.2320@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > I'm afraid that I don't know how to eliminate the warnings, but (and > anyone please correct me if I'm wrong) I don't think you need to worry > about them. perfectly in v2 despite the warnings from VS.NET 2005. I'd still be interested to know if there's a different / better way of achieving this in ASP.NET 2...
Other interesting topics
HttpWeb Request from Class Library fails to 500
Password Field Web access failed - need help Problem with porting 1.1 code to 2.0 Can't get rid of the time part of a date Syntax error about daAngio.Fill(dsAngio, "AngioInfo") call functions by pointer? Interacting with Outlook Why aren't master pages part of themes? Q: DateTime Difference |
|||||||||||||||||||||||