|
.net
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Determine Which Button PressedIn my page initialize, I am loading dynamic controls for a survey. On the
survey, I have a stop button. If the user clicks the stop button, because of the page life cycle, the initialize and page load events run before the button click and reloads a bunch of controls. Is there a way to keep these events from running with a button control. The click event of the button has code to save the user's place in the survey and I only want it to run. Thanks. did u tried use the Wizard component under asp.net 2.0 to do such task???
-- Show quoteBruno Alexandre "a Portuguese in København, Danmark" "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> escreveu na mensagem news:BB51CC4E-06A8-4206-BA38-CC732E0E4753@microsoft.com... > In my page initialize, I am loading dynamic controls for a survey. On the > survey, I have a stop button. If the user clicks the stop button, because > of > the page life cycle, the initialize and page load events run before the > button click and reloads a bunch of controls. Is there a way to keep these > events from running with a button control. The click event of the button > has > code to save the user's place in the survey and I only want it to run. > Thanks. I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that.
Show quote "Bruno Alexandre" wrote: > did u tried use the Wizard component under asp.net 2.0 to do such task??? > > -- > > Bruno Alexandre > "a Portuguese in København, Danmark" > > > > "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> escreveu na mensagem > news:BB51CC4E-06A8-4206-BA38-CC732E0E4753@microsoft.com... > > In my page initialize, I am loading dynamic controls for a survey. On the > > survey, I have a stop button. If the user clicks the stop button, because > > of > > the page life cycle, the initialize and page load events run before the > > button click and reloads a bunch of controls. Is there a way to keep these > > events from running with a button control. The click event of the button > > has > > code to save the user's place in the survey and I only want it to run. > > Thanks. > > > re:
>I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. What the h*ll are you doing using ASP.NET 1.0 ?At the very least you should be using ASP.NET 1.1. although everybody should be, at least, testing ASP.NET 2.0. Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/ asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/ foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/ =================================== Show quote "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:CD7626C6-1789-41F5-A0C9-7663FE356BE9@microsoft.com... >I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. > > "Bruno Alexandre" wrote: > >> did u tried use the Wizard component under asp.net 2.0 to do such task??? >> >> -- >> >> Bruno Alexandre >> "a Portuguese in København, Danmark" >> >> >> >> "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> escreveu na mensagem >> news:BB51CC4E-06A8-4206-BA38-CC732E0E4753@microsoft.com... >> > In my page initialize, I am loading dynamic controls for a survey. On the >> > survey, I have a stop button. If the user clicks the stop button, because >> > of >> > the page life cycle, the initialize and page load events run before the >> > button click and reloads a bunch of controls. Is there a way to keep these >> > events from running with a button control. The click event of the button >> > has >> > code to save the user's place in the survey and I only want it to run. >> > Thanks. >> >> >> That was a typo. Is this better: v1.1.4322. I would like help instead of
criticism. Show quote "Juan T. Llibre" wrote: > re: > >I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. > > What the h*ll are you doing using ASP.NET 1.0 ? > > At the very least you should be using ASP.NET 1.1. > although everybody should be, at least, testing ASP.NET 2.0. > > > > Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP > aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/ > asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/ > foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/ > =================================== > "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:CD7626C6-1789-41F5-A0C9-7663FE356BE9@microsoft.com... > >I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. > > > > "Bruno Alexandre" wrote: > > > >> did u tried use the Wizard component under asp.net 2.0 to do such task??? > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Bruno Alexandre > >> "a Portuguese in København, Danmark" > >> > >> > >> > >> "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> escreveu na mensagem > >> news:BB51CC4E-06A8-4206-BA38-CC732E0E4753@microsoft.com... > >> > In my page initialize, I am loading dynamic controls for a survey. On the > >> > survey, I have a stop button. If the user clicks the stop button, because > >> > of > >> > the page life cycle, the initialize and page load events run before the > >> > button click and reloads a bunch of controls. Is there a way to keep these > >> > events from running with a button control. The click event of the button > >> > has > >> > code to save the user's place in the survey and I only want it to run. > >> > Thanks. > >> > >> > >> > > > re:
> That was a typo. Is this better: v1.1.4322. Yes, that's better.re: >I would like help instead of criticism. Posting correct information would help you in getting help.You should consider upgrading to 2.0. Is there anything stopping you from doing that ? Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/ asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/ foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/ =================================== Show quote "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:912717D9-6809-48E1-B3BF-ABA4A9EFF9C0@microsoft.com... > That was a typo. Is this better: v1.1.4322. I would like help instead of > criticism. > "Juan T. Llibre" wrote: > >> re: >> >I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. >> >> What the h*ll are you doing using ASP.NET 1.0 ? >> >> At the very least you should be using ASP.NET 1.1. >> although everybody should be, at least, testing ASP.NET 2.0. >> >> Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP >> "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:CD7626C6-1789-41F5-A0C9-7663FE356BE9@microsoft.com... >> >I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. >> >> did u tried use the Wizard component under asp.net 2.0 to do such task??? >> >> >> >> Bruno Alexandre Thanks...I realize correct information is much better when needing help.
Sorry for the typo. The office where I work just started using VS 2003 this year, so there are no plans to upgrade for at least 2 years. Show quote "Juan T. Llibre" wrote: > re: > > That was a typo. Is this better: v1.1.4322. > > Yes, that's better. > > re: > >I would like help instead of criticism. > > Posting correct information would help you in getting help. > > You should consider upgrading to 2.0. > Is there anything stopping you from doing that ? > > > > > Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP > aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/ > asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/ > foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/ > =================================== > "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:912717D9-6809-48E1-B3BF-ABA4A9EFF9C0@microsoft.com... > > That was a typo. Is this better: v1.1.4322. I would like help instead of > > criticism. > > > "Juan T. Llibre" wrote: > > > >> re: > >> >I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. > >> > >> What the h*ll are you doing using ASP.NET 1.0 ? > >> > >> At the very least you should be using ASP.NET 1.1. > >> although everybody should be, at least, testing ASP.NET 2.0. > >> > >> Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP > > >> "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:CD7626C6-1789-41F5-A0C9-7663FE356BE9@microsoft.com... > >> >I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. > > >> >> did u tried use the Wizard component under asp.net 2.0 to do such task??? > >> >> > >> >> Bruno Alexandre > > > re:
> Thanks...I realize correct information is much better when needing help. No problem...> Sorry for the typo. re: > The office where I work just started using VS 2003 this year, Do the guys who run your office realize that VWD is free ?> so there are no plans to upgrade for at least 2 years. Also, do they realize that running the .Net Framework 2.0 is free ? They're free downloads. Get VWD at : http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/vwd/download/ You can also download the free .Net Framework 2.0 redistributable at : http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=0856eacb-436... And, you can download, for free, the .Net Framework 2.0 SDK at : http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=FE6F2099-B7B... With VWD and the .Net Framework redistributable -or the SDK- there's no need to spend money for an IDE which *can* target .Net Framework 2.0 objects. You can continue to use VS 2003 for your .Net Framework/ASP.NET 1.1 development. That won't interfere with your *free* development of ASP.NET 2.0 apps. Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/ asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/ foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/ =================================== Show quote "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4892409B-D0D7-41B2-995D-FCFABDBEDEEA@microsoft.com... > Thanks...I realize correct information is much better when needing help. > Sorry for the typo. > > The office where I work just started using VS 2003 this year, so there are > no plans to upgrade for at least 2 years. > > "Juan T. Llibre" wrote: > >> re: >> > That was a typo. Is this better: v1.1.4322. >> >> Yes, that's better. >> >> re: >> >I would like help instead of criticism. >> >> Posting correct information would help you in getting help. >> >> You should consider upgrading to 2.0. >> Is there anything stopping you from doing that ? >> >> >> >> >> Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP >> aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/ >> asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/ >> foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/ >> =================================== >> "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:912717D9-6809-48E1-B3BF-ABA4A9EFF9C0@microsoft.com... >> > That was a typo. Is this better: v1.1.4322. I would like help instead of >> > criticism. >> >> > "Juan T. Llibre" wrote: >> > >> >> re: >> >> >I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. >> >> >> >> What the h*ll are you doing using ASP.NET 1.0 ? >> >> >> >> At the very least you should be using ASP.NET 1.1. >> >> although everybody should be, at least, testing ASP.NET 2.0. >> >> >> >> Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP >> >> >> "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> >> news:CD7626C6-1789-41F5-A0C9-7663FE356BE9@microsoft.com... >> >> >I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. >> >> >> >> did u tried use the Wizard component under asp.net 2.0 to do such task??? >> >> >> >> >> >> Bruno Alexandre >> >> >> I did not realize that VS 2003 could take advantage of the new things in the
2.0 framework, but we have a very rigid process that keeps us from being to upgrade until approved by higher until they have "fully" tested it. The one great day I am on my own, I'll work with all the latest and greatest :) Do you know if I can do what I need in VS 2003? Show quote "Juan T. Llibre" wrote: > re: > > Thanks...I realize correct information is much better when needing help. > > Sorry for the typo. > > No problem... > > re: > > The office where I work just started using VS 2003 this year, > > so there are no plans to upgrade for at least 2 years. > > Do the guys who run your office realize that VWD is free ? > Also, do they realize that running the .Net Framework 2.0 is free ? > > They're free downloads. > > Get VWD at : > http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/vwd/download/ > > You can also download the free .Net Framework 2.0 redistributable at : > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=0856eacb-436... > > And, you can download, for free, the .Net Framework 2.0 SDK at : > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=FE6F2099-B7B... > > With VWD and the .Net Framework redistributable -or the SDK- there's no need > to spend money for an IDE which *can* target .Net Framework 2.0 objects. > > You can continue to use VS 2003 for your .Net Framework/ASP.NET 1.1 development. > That won't interfere with your *free* development of ASP.NET 2.0 apps. > > > > Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP > aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/ > asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/ > foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/ > =================================== > > "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:4892409B-D0D7-41B2-995D-FCFABDBEDEEA@microsoft.com... > > Thanks...I realize correct information is much better when needing help. > > Sorry for the typo. > > > > The office where I work just started using VS 2003 this year, so there are > > no plans to upgrade for at least 2 years. > > > > "Juan T. Llibre" wrote: > > > >> re: > >> > That was a typo. Is this better: v1.1.4322. > >> > >> Yes, that's better. > >> > >> re: > >> >I would like help instead of criticism. > >> > >> Posting correct information would help you in getting help. > >> > >> You should consider upgrading to 2.0. > >> Is there anything stopping you from doing that ? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP > >> aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/ > >> asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/ > >> foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/ > >> =================================== > >> "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:912717D9-6809-48E1-B3BF-ABA4A9EFF9C0@microsoft.com... > >> > That was a typo. Is this better: v1.1.4322. I would like help instead of > >> > criticism. > >> > >> > "Juan T. Llibre" wrote: > >> > > >> >> re: > >> >> >I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. > >> >> > >> >> What the h*ll are you doing using ASP.NET 1.0 ? > >> >> > >> >> At the very least you should be using ASP.NET 1.1. > >> >> although everybody should be, at least, testing ASP.NET 2.0. > >> >> > >> >> Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP > >> > >> >> "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:CD7626C6-1789-41F5-A0C9-7663FE356BE9@microsoft.com... > >> >> >I am only using ASP.Net 1.0. As far as I know, there is no wizard for that. > >> > >> >> >> did u tried use the Wizard component under asp.net 2.0 to do such task??? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Bruno Alexandre > >> > >> > >> > > > > "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message It can't, but that's not what Juan actually said...news:B7970152-C425-4120-9616-3A5F663C3DFE@microsoft.com... >I did not realize that VS 2003 could take advantage of the new things in >the > 2.0 framework, > but we have a very rigid process that keeps us from being to Maybe that time has come...> upgrade until approved by higher until they have "fully" tested it. The > one > great day I am on my own, I'll work with all the latest and greatest :) > Do you know if I can do what I need in VS 2003? private void Page_Init(object sender, EventArgs e){ // create your dynamic buttons - you'll need to do this every time the page loads irrespective of whether it's been posted back or not if (!Page.IsPostback) { // do something which won't happen when the page is posted back } } private void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (!Page.IsPostback) { // do something which won't happen when the page is posted back } } "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message You've obviously tried if (!Page.IsPostback) ...?news:BB51CC4E-06A8-4206-BA38-CC732E0E4753@microsoft.com... > In my page initialize, I am loading dynamic controls for a survey. On the > survey, I have a stop button. If the user clicks the stop button, because > of > the page life cycle, the initialize and page load events run before the > button click and reloads a bunch of controls. Is there a way to keep these > events from running with a button control. The click event of the button > has > code to save the user's place in the survey and I only want it to run. > Thanks. This is what I have right now in the initialize event:
private void Page_Init(object sender, EventArgs e) { InitializeComponent(); if (Page.IsPostBack) { //Load dynamic controls. LoadNextSurveyPage(); } base.OnInit(e); } I am doing Page.IsPostBack so it does not run on the initial load because we are displaying instructions first., so I am wondering how to use the "stop survey" button that I added through the designer to keep the above from running. Show quote "Mark Rae" wrote: > "Mike Collins" <MikeColl***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:BB51CC4E-06A8-4206-BA38-CC732E0E4753@microsoft.com... > > > In my page initialize, I am loading dynamic controls for a survey. On the > > survey, I have a stop button. If the user clicks the stop button, because > > of > > the page life cycle, the initialize and page load events run before the > > button click and reloads a bunch of controls. Is there a way to keep these > > events from running with a button control. The click event of the button > > has > > code to save the user's place in the survey and I only want it to run. > > Thanks. > > You've obviously tried if (!Page.IsPostback) ...? > > > You can't stop the events from firing but you might be able to use some
heuristics to determine which button caused the postback. In your Page_xxx handlers you can look at the post body and check to see if the btn data is in there. For example, if I have this <asp:Button runat="server" id="stop" Text="Stop Survey"/> Then in the event handler the Request object's items collection will have a key called "stop" with the value "Stop Survey" so you could look for that combination in the handlers alongside the IsPostback flag and use that information to not use the postback. If this is too kludgy then you could use a hidden form field, then when the user clicks on the stop button use a javascript function to set the value of the control before sending the postback to the server. You could then use the items collection to look for that value, Kevin Thanks...I'll look into doing that.
Show quote "Kevin Jones" wrote: > You can't stop the events from firing but you might be able to use some > heuristics to determine which button caused the postback. > > In your Page_xxx handlers you can look at the post body and check to see > if the btn data is in there. For example, if I have this > > <asp:Button runat="server" id="stop" Text="Stop Survey"/> > > Then in the event handler the Request object's items collection will > have a key called "stop" with the value "Stop Survey" so you could look > for that combination in the handlers alongside the IsPostback flag and > use that information to not use the postback. > > If this is too kludgy then you could use a hidden form field, then when > the user clicks on the stop button use a javascript function to set the > value of the control before sending the postback to the server. You > could then use the items collection to look for that value, > > Kevin > I added this to the initialize event and it worked...thanks.
if ((Page.IsPostBack) && (Request.Params.Get("btnStop") == null)) { ...code to load dynamic controls } Show quote "Kevin Jones" wrote: > You can't stop the events from firing but you might be able to use some > heuristics to determine which button caused the postback. > > In your Page_xxx handlers you can look at the post body and check to see > if the btn data is in there. For example, if I have this > > <asp:Button runat="server" id="stop" Text="Stop Survey"/> > > Then in the event handler the Request object's items collection will > have a key called "stop" with the value "Stop Survey" so you could look > for that combination in the handlers alongside the IsPostback flag and > use that information to not use the postback. > > If this is too kludgy then you could use a hidden form field, then when > the user clicks on the stop button use a javascript function to set the > value of the control before sending the postback to the server. You > could then use the items collection to look for that value, > > Kevin >  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics